RGT, Em<span id="more-15869"></span>battled British Problem Gambling Advocate, Faces Allegations of Nepotism from UK Media

Jonathan Parke, former head of commissioning at RGT, now director of Sophoro Ltd.

The Responsible Gambling Trust (RGT), the UK’s leading problem advocacy that is gambling, has found itself in the harsh glare of the news spotlight again, this time for allegations of nepotism.

The charity, that will be funded by the bookmaking industry to the tune of $5 million each year to research and promote the prevention of problem gambling, has been under fire in the press that is british for apparent conflicts of great interest. Because of its ties that are close the gambling industry, concerns have already been asked as to whether its scientific studies are fully independent of video gaming interests.

The RGT maintains that it is impartial. But the revelation this week by the united kingdom’s Independent newspaper that a firm owned by the husband of this charity’s Director of Commissioning, Jane Rigbye, has been granted a research that is lucrative, isn’t assisting the reason for credibility for the outfit.

Marital Agreements

According towards the Independent, Sophoro Ltd. owned by Rigbye’s husband Jonathan Parke, is offered a major research agreement as part of a £750,000 initiative into the aftereffect of online gaming on problem gambling.

Parke was previously head of commissioning at RGT himself, leading to accusations he and his wife swapped jobs, then quickly swapped contracts.

Sophoro had been awarded the contract in the first of two, but until last year the company was registered at the couple’s family home, and both Rigbye and Parke were listed as company directors december.

Moreover, Sophoro bid for the RGT contract simply two months after Rigbye stepped down as director to take in her brand new role at RGT.

In response to the news, Labour shadow gambling minister Clive Efford said RGT ‘should be disbanded’ if its research ended up being found to protect the ‘interests of the industry at the expense of people with gambling problems.’

Goulden Steps Down

RGT has always been accused of being too sympathetic to the industry, and in particular for its refusal to denounce fixed-odds terminals that are bettingFOBTs) in bookmaking shops.

Last thirty days, Neil Goulden, the trust’s president, stepped criticism that is down following The Guardian newspaper that while chair of RGT, he was additionally a chair associated with the industry lobby group known as the Association of British Bookmakers (ABB). The roles had been held concurrently between 2012 and mid-2014.

Goulden told the Guardian that RGT, and the involvement to his participation of the industry as whole, was integral to researching and ultimately understanding issue gambling.

‘[Bookmakers] wouldn’t normally have released data or have taken the actions it continues to take in prevention of damage without my influence that is personal and,’ he said.

RGT, which will be investigated by the charity regulator within the Sophoro affair, told the Independent that Rigbye had no say in commissioning of research agreements.

DraftKings Appeals Ny AG Lawsuit, Filing Says Empire State Should Ban Spelling Bees

New York AG Eric Schneiderman, that has been accused by DraftKings of making mistakes in his lawsuit against DFS sites. (Image: pokerhomegames.com)

DraftKings has launched its appeal against the New York State injunction that is preliminary seeks to ban day-to-day dream sports (DFS) and put an end to its operations in the Empire State.

The DFS operator’s 67-page filing pulls no punches, accusing ny Attorney General Eric Schneiderman of legal misapprehensions that ‘did perhaps not come close to carrying the burden’ of proof that DFS is not a game of ability.

It further accuses the court of ‘abusing its discretion’ in siding with Schneiderman.

‘The court applied the wrong appropriate standard, and ignored the undisputed proof, to locate that daily fantasy sports contests are games of chance,’ the company argued in its filing.

Can be An Entry Fee A wager?

In December, Justice Manuel Mendez granted the AG’s injunction, ordering DraftKings and FanDuel to cease operations in New York State, its market that is second-biggest after.

DraftKings immediately filed an expedited movement to stay the court’s decision pending the outcome of its appeal. This is upheld by a Court of Appeals judge that same afternoon, permitting the companies to continue business temporarily in ny until the case is solved.

In his December ruling, Mendez was in fact needed to determine whether DFS had been a game of skill or of chance, and more specifically, whether setting a line-up was a process that is skill-based an ‘entry fee,’ or an out-and-out ‘wager.’ He decided it was the latter.

‘New York State law that is penal perhaps not refer to ‘wagering’ or ‘betting,’ rather it states that an individual, ‘risks something of value,» he said. ‘The re payment of an ‘entry fee’ because high as $10,600 on one or more contests daily could be deemed risking certainly ‘something of value.’ ‘

Dog Shows and Bass Fishing

DraftKings’ appeal filing claims that when this were the case, then ‘dog shows and bees that are spelling yachting tournaments and bass fishing’ should be ‘criminalized’ under Judge Mendez’s ruling. Each among these are events entry that is requiring whose outcome is prone to a component of chance, argues the DraftKings filing.

‘Daily fantasy sports are skill-based games which are, and may be, legal,’ DraftKings’ attorney David Boies stated in a declaration. ‘DraftKings competitions are believe it or 888 casino nz not legal than season-long fantasy sports, that your Attorney General has repeatedly conceded are legal.’

In January, Schneiderman amended his lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel to look for the return of all the buy-ins paid by New York residents paid to both businesses throughout 2015, plus a $5,000 fine per head.

With 600,000 DFS customers in the state, this would constitute a huge selection of millions of dollars in buy-ins, plus around $3 billion in fines.

Outrage Over NFL-Owned Children Daily Fantasy Sports Site from Youth Advocacy Group

The NFL kids daily fantasy sports site is facing backlash from a few outraged groups, arguing the league should not be marketing their product to children as early as six years old. (Image: fantasy.nflrush.com)

Targeted at pre-teen kids, day-to-day fantasy sports (DFS) site NFL Rush is being asked to stop operations by the non-profit company Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC).

The truth is that the National Football League is catering to children to participate in free DFS contests, with the chance of winning weekly prizes like an XBOX One, video games, and a grand prize of a $5,000 scholarship in a story that might seem more appropriate for satire.

Based on the NFL Rush Fantasy website, ‘US residents between 6 and 12 who have actually parental consent are eligible.’

Though the league and its commissioner, Roger Goodell, have long publicly opposed sports gambling and betting, it apparently doesn’t have qualms when it concerns children and dream sports. In conjunction with the National Council on Problem Gambling, the CCFC is calling on Goodell while the NFL to stop marketing fantasy soccer to young ones.

‘ There is proof that playing dream sports, particularly with the incentive of valuable awards as offered on the NFL Rush Fantasy website and app, can lead to problem gambling and addiction,’ CCFC Executive Director Josh Golin said in his letter to your league. ‘It is unconscionable that the NFL encourages kiddies as young as six yrs . old to develop the habit of doing this adult task.’

NFL Hypocrisy?

The NFL has always maintained that any expansion of old-fashioned recreations betting could negatively impact the league and compromise the integrity of its games. Surprisingly, it’s taken a stance that is rather different daily fantasy contests.

FanDuel has contracts with 15 NFL groups, while Dallas Cowboys and brand New England Patriots owners Jerry Jones and Robert Kraft hold stakes in DraftKings.

DFS differs from sports gambling due to the very fact that the participant isn’t simply picking a team or line, but assembling a roster of players in an activity that is recognized as to be an endeavor that is skill-based.

Multiple solicitors general have ruled that DFS constitutes gambling, using the operators themselves, not surprisingly, fighting right back. The statistics on who routinely wins DFS contests seems to help the ability over luck debate.

But as it relates to children, teaching 6 to 12-year-olds how to assemble a group of players to offer top likelihood of winning a video game console is cause for concern certainly.

‘By providing these valuable incentives, the NFL is indoctrinating kids into engaging in dream recreations by having a stake that is financial the outcome,’ the CCFC noted. ‘This exposes them, and our communities, to the potential risks of gambling problems.’

You’ve Got to Be Carefully Taught

It ought to be noted that the NFL hasn’t just promoted a site that is online it’s provided an in-classroom curriculum for teachers as well. Launched in 2014, NFL Rush Fantasy Learn, Play, Score! was billed as a math and language arts program based around fantasy sports. The league says that this system wrapped by the end of 2014-2015 period, but in it, children were encouraged to ‘choose their fantasy that is ultimate team week’ through critical thinking.

The program did employ basic math in determining exactly how numerous fantasy points are to be allocated based on the player’s performance, nonetheless it also required the student to comprehend the rules of soccer. Critics of the scheme argued it’s the NFL’s way to engage a new audience, as youth soccer involvement continues to decline.

Hey, have you thought to simply teach the value of a dollar with a ‘Let It Rain’ mathematics program because well?

No Safeguards for Guardians

In the event that you’re thinking NFL Rush features a few defenses to avoid children from registering by themselves, you’ll be surprised to learn that registrants are simply just required to provide their parent’s email address, therefore that the NFL can verify their guardian and age permission.

Clearly no 10-year-old would think to enter their friend’s email or develop a yahoo that is quick to self-confirm their validation, right? Of course maybe not.

From on the web poker to the emergence of daily fantasy sports, the primary concern for a lot of legislators is how to best protect adult consumers while video gaming on the Internet, as well because the really issue of age verification. However, into the situation involving kids, the most susceptible and impressionable demographic, small will be done to keep your child that is way-under-18-year-old from in daily fantasy sports.

Interestingly, nobody from the contingent that is pro-RAWA to have jumped with this web site as evidence that kiddies will never be exempt from gambling online. It’s exactly the type or type of fodder that Sheldon Adelson and the bill’s other sponsors, like presidential GOP contender Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida), would want to throw in the face of everyone who supports Internet gaming.

LEGG IGJEN EN KOMMENTAR

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here